Legal Opinion

Ayers v. Astrue

District Court, D. Delaware

Decided July 14, 2010No. Civil Action 08-634-JJFPublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM OPINION

FARNAN, District Judge.

Presently before the Court is an appeal pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 405(g) filed by Plaintiff, Pandoria Ayers, seeking review of the final administrative decision of the Commissioner of the Social Security Administration (the “Administration”) denying her claims for disability insurance benefits (“DIB”) and supplemental security income (“SSI”) under Title II and Title XVI, respectively of the Social Security Act (the “Act”), 42 U.S.C. §§ 401-433, 1381-1383f. Plaintiff has filed a Motion For Summary Judgment (D.I. 16) requesting the Court to reverse the…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Pierce v. UnderwoodSupreme Court of the United States · 1988
  2. Sims v. ApfelSupreme Court of the United States · 2000
  3. Evelyn Plummer v. Kenneth S. Apfel, Commissioner of Social SecurityCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1999
  4. Tommaso Fargnoli v. Larry G. Massanari, Commissioner, Social Security AdministrationCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2001
  5. Wayne R. Hartranft v. Kenneth S. Apfel, Commissioner Social Security AdministrationCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1999

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. MCCRAKEN v. SOCIAL SECURITYDistrict Court, D. New Jersey · 2023

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API