Legal Opinion
S.N.A. Nut Co. v. Haagen-Dazs Co. (In Re S.N.A. Nut Co.)
United States Bankruptcy Court, N.D. Illinois
Decided April 5, 2000No. 19-04375PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
FINDINGS OF FACT AND CONCLUSIONS OF LAW
ERWIN I. KATZ, Bankruptcy Judge.
The debtor, S.N.A. Nut Company (“SNA”), filed a two-count Amended Com plaint against the Haagen-Dazs Company, Inc. (“HD”), alleging that SNA and HD entered into five contracts for the purchase and sale of specially manufactured nut products to be used in HD’s ice cream. In Count I, SNA seeks damages in the amount of $981,866 for breach of all five contracts. In Count II, SNA seeks damages in the same amount, based upon a theory of promissory estoppel. HD’s Answer included fifteen affirmative defenses.
Partial summary…
2Cases cited18 opinions
- Bead Chain Manufacturing Co. v. Saxton Products, Inc.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1981
- Dean Foods Company v. Ben Brancel, Secretary of the Wisconsin Dept. Of Agriculture, Trade and Consumer ProtectionCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1999
- Timber Access Industries Co. v. U. S. Plywood-Champion Papers, Inc.Oregon Supreme Court · 1972
- Tigg Corporation, in 91-3345 v. Dow Corning Corporation, in 91-3232 and 91-3344Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1992
- In Re Michael J. KRUEGER, Debtor-AppellantCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1999
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Purina Mills, L.L.C. v. LessDistrict Court, N.D. Iowa · 2003
- Atlantic Orient Corp. v. AOC Energy LLC (In Re Atlantic Orient Corp.)United States Bankruptcy Court, D. New Hampshire · 2003
- In re: Kvn Corporation, Inc.United States Bankruptcy Appellate Panel for the Ninth Circuit · 2014