Legal Opinion
Great Hill Lake, Inc. v. Caswell
Supreme Court of Connecticut
Decided February 7, 1940PublishedCited by 23 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtJennings, J.
The lands of the plaintiff and defendants abut Great Hill Lake, an artificial body of water. The question to be decided is the extent of their respective rights in it. The plaintiff attacks the finding and conclusions of the trial court and excepts to one ruling on evidence.
The examination of the evidence made necessary by the attack on the finding discloses that the trial judge had great difficulty in finding out just what the claim of the plaintiff was. Certain paragraphs of the finding which are not disputed give the basic facts with reference to title. Great Hill Lake is formed by the…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- Dawson v. Town of OrangeSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1905
- American Brass Co. v. SerraSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1926
- McPheters v. LoomisSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1939
- Adams v. PeaseSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1818
- Manning v. SmithSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1826
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by23 opinions
- Peterson v. Town of OxfordSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1983
- Beckwith v. RossiSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1961
- Gager v. CarlsonSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1959
- Kuras v. KopeSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1987
- Missionary Society v. CoutuSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1948
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.