Luce v. Clarke
Supreme Court of Minnesota
Appeal by plaintiff, George S. Luce, from an order of the District Court of Hennepin County, Lochren, L, made August 14, 1891, refusing his application for a new trial. On July 30, 1874, at Galesville, Wis., Albert E. Clarke, the defendant, bought of plaintiff, for $2,400, the Galesville Journal and subscription list, and the printing presses, type, furniture, and material used in its publication.
Read the full summary
Appeal by plaintiff, George S. Luce, from an order of the District Court of Hennepin County, Lochren, L, made August 14, 1891, refusing his application for a new trial. On July 30, 1874, at Galesville, Wis., Albert E. Clarke, the defendant, bought of plaintiff, for $2,400, the Galesville Journal and subscription list, and the printing presses, type, furniture, and material used in its publication. He paid down $500, and gave four notes for the residue, — One for $500, due December 1, 1874; a second for $500, due May 1, 1875; the third for $500, due November 1, 1875; and the fourth for $400,…
1Opinion of the CourtGilfillan, C. J.
1878 G. S. ch. 66, §§ 15, 16, read:
“Sec. 15. If, when the cause of action accrues against a person, he is out of the state, the action may be commenced, within the times herein limited, after his return to the state; and if, after the cause of action accrues, he departs from and resides out of the state, the time of his absence is not part of the time limited for the commencement of the action.
“Sec. 16. When a cause of action has arisen in a state or territory out of this state, or in a foreign country, and by the laws thereof an action thereon cannot there be maintained by reason of the…
2Cited by20 opinions
- Bruner v. MartinSupreme Court of Kansas · 1907
- Moran v. MoranSupreme Court of Iowa · 1909
- Bliler v. BoswellWyoming Supreme Court · 1900
- Doughty v. FunkSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1905
- West v. TheisIdaho Supreme Court · 1908
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.