Legal Opinion

American Timber & Trading Co. v. First National Bank

Oregon Supreme Court

Decided September 8, 1972PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtHolman, J.

Plaintiff American Timber and Trading Co. brought this action on behalf of itself and all persons similarly situated. The other named plaintiffs, having a similar claim, were allowed to intervene. Defendant, First National Bank of Oregon, filed a motion which was treated by the parties and the trial court as a demurrer. The demurrer was sustained and plaintiffs, after failing to plead further, appealed from an order dismissing their complaints.

Plaintiffs allege they borrowed money from defendant bank and agreed to pay interest at a specified yearly rate. They contend that the bank, without…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Williams v. Pacific Surety Co.Oregon Supreme Court · 1912
  2. Mursener v. ForteOregon Supreme Court · 1948
  3. Duke v. FranklinOregon Supreme Court · 1945
  4. Liggett v. LaddOregon Supreme Court · 1888
  5. Tobin v. Portland Mills Co.Oregon Supreme Court · 1902

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. Perlman v. First National Bank of ChicagoAppellate Court of Illinois · 1973
  2. Bernard v. First National Bank of OregonOregon Supreme Court · 1976
  3. Black v. ArizalaCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2002
  4. John Deere Indus. Equipment Co., Inc. v. DelphiaOregon Supreme Court · 1973
  5. K v. Health Div., Dept. of Human ResourcesCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1976

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API