Legal Opinion
Dixon v. Stedman
District Court, E.D. New York
Decided March 30, 2023No. 1:22-cv-03581Unknown
1Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK ---------------------------------------------------------x TERRANCE DIXON, Plaintiff, MEMORANDUM AND ORDER 22-CV-3581 (RPK) (LB) v. EMILY STEDMAN, ROSS ANDERSON, FRANCIS LOCOCO, and HUSCH BLACKWELL LLP, Defendants. ---------------------------------------------------------x RACHEL P. KOVNER, United States District Judge: Defendants move to dismiss pro se plaintiff Terrance Dixon’s complaint for insufficient service of process and lack of personal jurisdiction pursuant to Federal Rules of Civil Procedure 12(b)(2) and (5). For the reasons…
2Cases cited27 opinions
- Coppedge v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1962
- International Shoe Co. v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1945
- Helicopteros Nacionales De Colombia, S. A. v. HallSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Daimler AG v. BaumanSupreme Court of the United States · 2014
- Metropolitan Life Insurance Company v. Robertson-Ceco Corp., United Dominion Industries, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1996
22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.