Legal Opinion

Barnett's v. Clooney

Missouri Court of Appeals

Decided December 15, 1896PublishedCited by 3 opinions

Appeal from the St. Louis City Circuit Court. — Hon. Pembeook R. Flitoeaet, Judge.

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION ON MOTION POE EEHEAEING.

Rombateb, P. J.

validity of second lien.

The defendant claims that as the suit was instituted on the second mechanic’s lien filed, he was entitled to have the plaintiff nonsuited, provided the first lien filed was a good and valid lien, because in that event the second lien was a nullity and would not support a motion. While this seems to have been the rule in this state once, the later decisions as pointed out in the opinion have established a more equitable rule. Under these deei- . . sions the second hen is not a nullity, if the first lien filed was in any way…

2Cited by3 opinions

  1. Philip Gruner & Bros. Lumber v. Hartshorn-Barber Realty & Building Co.Missouri Court of Appeals · 1913
  2. Lindley v. McGlauflinWashington Supreme Court · 1910
  3. Fox v. Benham Manufacturing Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1917

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API