Legal Opinion

Schaefer v. Ready

Idaho Court of Appeals

Decided March 2, 2000No. 25257PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

SCHWARTZMAN, Judge.

Scott and Marla Schaefer (the Schaefers) appeal from the district court’s denial of their motion for new trial or, in the alternative, an additur. The Schaefers assert that the compensatory and punitive damages awarded by the jury were inadequate such that a new trial or an additur was warranted. The Schaefers also assert that errors in law occurred at trial, thus making a new trial necessary.

I

FACTS AND PROCEDURE

On December 3, 1993, Kelly Ready was driving home from an office Christmas party sponsored by Idaho Power Company and held at the Seven Mile Lounge. Ready was…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. Sun Valley Shopping Center, Inc. v. Idaho Power Co.Idaho Supreme Court · 1991
  2. Mathie v. FriesCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1997
  3. Cheney v. Palos Verdes Investment Corp.Idaho Supreme Court · 1983
  4. Jeffrey Kemezy v. James PetersCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1996
  5. Sanchez v. GaleyIdaho Supreme Court · 1987

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Vendelin v. Costco Wholesale Corp.Idaho Supreme Court · 2004
  2. Bailey v. SanfordIdaho Supreme Court · 2004
  3. Wallace v. PoulosDistrict Court, D. Maryland · 2012
  4. Burks v. Bailey (In re Bailey)United States Bankruptcy Court, D. Idaho · 2013
  5. Fleegel v. Estate of BoylesAlaska Supreme Court · 2002

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API