Legal Opinion
Barnell v. Paine Webber Jackson & Curtis, Inc.
District Court, S.D. New York
Decided July 25, 1985No. 82 Civ. 1988 (SWK)PublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER
KRAM, District Judge.
The above-captioned action is before this Court upon the motion of defendant Paine Webber Jackson & Curtis, Incorporated (“Paine Webber”) for summary judgment in its favor. For the reasons stated below, defendant’s motion for summary judgment is denied.
BACKGROUND
Paine Webber employed plaintiff Marilyn Barnell as a stockbroker in its Park Avenue, New York City office from November, 1972 until she was terminated on March 29, 1979. * On April 17, 1980, plaintiff filed a complaint with the New York State Division of Human Rights (“NYSDHR”) charging…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Allen v. McCurrySupreme Court of the United States · 1980
- Zipes v. Trans World Airlines, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1982
- Kremer v. Chemical Construction Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1982
- Board of Regents of Univ. of State of NY v. TomanioSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
- Jerome Rosenberg v. Raymond v. MartinCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1973
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Durkin v. SheaDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1997
- Wilson v. WestDistrict Court, S.D. Mississippi · 1997