Legal Opinion
Arnold v. State of Ark.
District Court, E.D. Arkansas
Decided December 11, 1995No. LR-C-94-177, LR-C-93-884 and PB-C-94-99PublishedCited by 12 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER
EISELE, District Judge.
Before the Court are Plaintiffs Arnold and Stoneman’s Motions for Leave to Amend Complaint and all parties’ Cross-Motions for Partial Summary Judgment (which the Court will address later in this Order).
I. Motions for Leave to Amend Complaints
Rule 15(a) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure provides that once a responsive pleading has been served, “a party may amend the party’s pleading only by leave of court or by written consent of the adverse party; and leave shall be freely given when justice so requires.” The disposition of a motion to…
2Cases cited18 opinions
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Foman v. DavisSupreme Court of the United States · 1962
- Lujan v. National Wildlife FederationSupreme Court of the United States · 1990
- Anderson v. Mt. Clemens Pottery Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1946
- Walling v. Youngerman-Reynolds Hardwood Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1945
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by12 opinions
- Brian F. Monahan v. County Of Chesterfield, VirginiaCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1996
- Monahan v. County of ChesterfieldCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1996
- Bolick v. Brevard County Sheriff's DepartmentDistrict Court, M.D. Florida · 1996
- Baker v. Stone County, Mo.District Court, W.D. Missouri · 1999
- Cash v. Conn Appliances, Inc.District Court, E.D. Texas · 1997
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.