Legal Opinion
Arbuckle Abstract Co. v. Scott
Supreme Court of Oklahoma
Decided February 2, 1999No. 86,652PublishedCited by 12 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtLavender, J.
¶ 1 The following question is presented for our review: did the District Court in and for Carter County err by failing to dismiss a declaratory judgment suit brought by appel-lee, Arbuckle Abstract Company (AAC), a corporation desiring to become a licensed abstract company in Carter County? We hold the suit should have been dismissed because AAC failed to exhaust its administrative remedies before the Oklahoma Auditor and Inspector ( A & I), the State official responsible for regulating the abstract industry pursuant to the Oklahoma Abstractors Law (OAL), 74 O.S.1991, § 227.10 et seq. and no…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Ledbetter v. Oklahoma Alcoholic Beverage Laws Enforcement CommissionSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1988
- Ricks Exploration Co. v. Oklahoma Water Resources BoardSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1984
- Martin v. Harrah Independent School DistrictSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1975
- Gordon v. FollowellSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1964
- Lone Star Helicopters, Inc. v. StateSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1990
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by12 opinions
- OSAGE NATION v. BD. OF COMMISSIONERS OF OSAGE COUNTY and OSAGE NATION v. OSAGE COUNTY BD. OF ADJUSTMENTSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 2017
- Davis v. GHS Health Maintenance Organization, Inc.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 2001
- Tulsa Industrial Authority v. City of TulsaSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 2011
- Walker v. Group Health Services, Inc.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 2001
- Waste Connections, Inc. v. Oklahoma Department of Environmental QualitySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 2002
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.