Legal Opinion

In re H.W.

Ohio Supreme Court

Decided June 27, 2007No. 2006-0676PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtLanzinger, J.

{¶ 1} In this case, we determine whether a trial court abuses its discretion when it removes a child’s grandparents as parties to an action for permanent custody after the child’s parent reaches the age of majority. Because we hold that a trial court does not abuse its discretion in such an instance, we reverse and remand for further proceedings consistent with this opinion.

Facts

{¶ 2} At age 15, Tanna Howser, n.k.a. Tanna Howser-Walford, gave birth to H.W. in 1999 while living at home with her parents, Gaylene and Thomas Howser. Also living at the home was the child’s 27-year-old father, and…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Blakemore v. BlakemoreOhio Supreme Court · 1983
  2. State ex rel. Fowler v. SmithOhio Supreme Court · 1994
  3. In re SchmidtOhio Supreme Court · 1986
  4. In re WhitakerOhio Supreme Court · 1988
  5. In Re WalkerOhio Court of Appeals · 2005

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. In Re D.T., 07ap-853 (5-6-2008)Ohio Court of Appeals · 2008
  2. In re L.B.S.Ohio Court of Appeals · 2019
  3. In re I. W.Ohio Court of Appeals · 2019
  4. Kormanik v. CooperOhio Court of Appeals · 2011
  5. C.H. v. O'Malley (Slip Opinion)Ohio Supreme Court · 2019

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API