Legal Opinion

Allen v. Coffman

Court of Appeals of Kentucky

Decided June 15, 1809PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION of the Court, by

Ch. J. Bibb

— Coffman exhibited his bill, setting forth that in 1776, Silas Har-land executed his penal bond to Cyrus M’Crackin, conditioned for the conveyance, by deed of general ¿warran-tee, of onehalfof his settlement and pre-emption on Salt river, and one half of Isaac Taylor’s pre-emption of 1000 acres; that said Cyrus assigned this bond to YVil-liam M’Crackin; that the obligor departed this life, leaving James Harland hisheiror devisee, who isin possession of the 1400 acres on Salt river ; that William M’Crackin had departed this life, leaving Pamelia his only…

2Cited by3 opinions

  1. Denison v. LeagueTexas Supreme Court · 1856
  2. Miami Exporting Co. v. Bank of the United StatesOhio Supreme Court · 1833
  3. Lyman v. LymanU.S. Circuit Court for the District of Vermont · 1829

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API