Legal Opinion · Concurrence

United States v. Thompson

United States Court of Military Appeals

Decided January 28, 1991No. 63,631; CM 8802347Published

1ConcurrenceSullivan, Chief Judge

This Court should not resolve the granted issues concerning the military crime of burglary solely on the basis of the “any obstruction” language of paragraph 55c(2), Manual for Courts-Martial, United States, 1984. A presidential regulation cannot dictate the scope or meaning of a congressional enactment such as Article 129, Uniform Code of Military Justice, 10 USC § 929. See United States v. Watson, 31 MJ 49, 52 (CMA 1990). The proper basis for construing this Federal statute is that noted by Congress itself, namely: the common law of burglary at the time our Code was enacted. United States…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Taylor v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1990
  2. United States v. HarrisonUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1988
  3. United States v. WatsonUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1990
  4. United States v. BrandenburgCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1944
  5. United States v. Garland SpencerCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1988

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API