Legal Opinion

Peterson v. County of Los Angeles

California Court of Appeal

Decided September 18, 1986No. B019650PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

LILLIE, P. J.

Plaintiff Gary Peterson appeals from summary judgment entered against him and in favor of defendant County of Los Angeles.

Facts

Plaintiff sued the county and James Morrow, an employee of the county, 1 for damages for personal injuries allegedly sustained on January 13, 1981, when Morrow negligently came into contact with plaintiff’s leg while plaintiff was in the county jail facility. After answering the complaint defendant county moved for summary judgment on the ground of governmental immunity, arguing that it is not liable for plaintiff’s alleged injuries inasmuch as…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. In Re Marriage of FlahertyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1982
  2. Zeilman v. County of KernCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1985
  3. Bonus-Bilt, Inc. v. United Grocers, Ltd.California Court of Appeal · 1982
  4. Datil v. City of Los AngelesCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1968
  5. Larson v. City of OaklandCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1971

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Lawson v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2010
  2. Reed v. County of Santa CruzCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1995
  3. Terzian v. County of VenturaCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1994
  4. Untitled California Attorney General Opinion, California Attorney General Reports1991

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API