Legal Opinion

B. F. Sturtevant Co. v. Industrial Commission

Wisconsin Supreme Court

Decided February 10, 1925PublishedCited by 29 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtCrownhart, J.

The compensation act of the state of Wisconsin was passed in 1911. Its general purposes were very carefully considered, and its constitutionality was upheld in Borgnis v. Falk Co. 147 Wis. 327, 133 N. W. 209. Since then this court has many times affirmed its beñeficent purposes and declared the rule that it should be liberally construed to carry out such objects. This rule applies with equal force to the many amendments that have been added to the original act by subsequent legislation. The amend*15ment under consideration is intended to carry out a wise public policy of spreading the risk or…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Borgnis v. Falk Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1911
  2. Darlington v. . Mayor, C., of New YorkNew York Court of Appeals · 1865
  3. People Ex Rel. Einsfeld v. . MurrayNew York Court of Appeals · 1896
  4. The People v. . the Supervisors of ChenangoNew York Court of Appeals · 1853
  5. State ex rel. Postel v. MarcusWisconsin Supreme Court · 1915

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by29 opinions

  1. In Re Constitutionality of Chapter 315, Laws of 1943Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1943
  2. Flaska v. StateNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1946
  3. Payne v. City of RacineWisconsin Supreme Court · 1935
  4. State Ex Rel. Kleczka v. ContaWisconsin Supreme Court · 1978
  5. State ex rel. Ekern v. ZimmermanWisconsin Supreme Court · 1925

24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API