United States v. Roe
District Court, W.D. Missouri
1Opinion of the Court
JOHN W. OLIVER, District Judge.
This case pends on defendant’s alternative motion for directed judgment of acquittal or for new trial. Because that motion will be sustained, we believe the Government is entitled to a full statement of the reasons, as we see them, for our action.
Defendant was indicted and found guilty by a jury of a violation of Section 1621 of Title 18, United States Code. His defense was insanity.
The alleged perjury was committed in connection with testimony given by defendant in support of his motion, filed pursuant to Section 2255 of Title 28, United States Code, to vacate…
2Cases cited28 opinions
- Davis v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1895
- Cone v. West Virginia Pulp & Paper Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1947
- Bryan v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1950
- Archibald Lyles v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1958
- Ernest McDonald v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1962
23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- Duane Earl Pope v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1967
- Gray v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1969
- Swisher v. United StatesDistrict Court, W.D. Missouri · 1965
- United States v. SermonDistrict Court, W.D. Missouri · 1964
- Harold Pitts Roe v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1963
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.