Legal Opinion

Nelson v. Appleway Chevrolet, Inc.

Court of Appeals of Washington

Decided October 13, 2005No. 23504-1-IIIPublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

*931¶1 Business and Occupation (B&O) taxes are not intended to be construed as taxes upon purchasers or customers but, instead, “shall be levied upon, and collectible from, the person engaging in the business activities . . . [and] shall constitute part of the operating overhead.” RCW 82.04.500. Herbert Nelson purchased a vehicle from Appleway Volkswagen. After the purchase price was negotiated, the parties signed a sales agreement listing an additional amount designated as “Business & Occupation Tax Overhead.”1 Mr. Nelson filed an action seeking a declaratory judgment that Appleway’s collection…

2Cases cited35 opinions

  1. State v. J.M.Washington Supreme Court · 2001
  2. State v. WatsonWashington Supreme Court · 2002
  3. State v. KellerWashington Supreme Court · 2001
  4. Lacey Nursing Center, Inc. v. Department of RevenueWashington Supreme Court · 1995
  5. Bernethy v. Walt Failor's, Inc.Washington Supreme Court · 1982

30 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Nelson v. Appleway Chevrolet, Inc.Washington Supreme Court · 2007
  2. Nelson v. Appleway Chevrolet, Inc.Washington Supreme Court · 2007
  3. Peck v. AT & T MOBILITYWashington Supreme Court · 2012
  4. Peck v. AT&T MobilityWashington Supreme Court · 2012

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API