Nelson v. Appleway Chevrolet, Inc.
Court of Appeals of Washington
1Opinion of the Court
*931¶1 Business and Occupation (B&O) taxes are not intended to be construed as taxes upon purchasers or customers but, instead, “shall be levied upon, and collectible from, the person engaging in the business activities . . . [and] shall constitute part of the operating overhead.” RCW 82.04.500. Herbert Nelson purchased a vehicle from Appleway Volkswagen. After the purchase price was negotiated, the parties signed a sales agreement listing an additional amount designated as “Business & Occupation Tax Overhead.”1 Mr. Nelson filed an action seeking a declaratory judgment that Appleway’s collection…
2Cases cited35 opinions
- State v. J.M.Washington Supreme Court · 2001
- State v. WatsonWashington Supreme Court · 2002
- State v. KellerWashington Supreme Court · 2001
- Lacey Nursing Center, Inc. v. Department of RevenueWashington Supreme Court · 1995
- Bernethy v. Walt Failor's, Inc.Washington Supreme Court · 1982
30 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Nelson v. Appleway Chevrolet, Inc.Washington Supreme Court · 2007
- Nelson v. Appleway Chevrolet, Inc.Washington Supreme Court · 2007
- Peck v. AT & T MOBILITYWashington Supreme Court · 2012
- Peck v. AT&T MobilityWashington Supreme Court · 2012