Legal Opinion
Stevenson v. Carroll
Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit
Decided July 30, 2007No. 05-1088PublishedCited by 415 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION OF THE COURT
SMITH, Circuit Judge.
Three detainees in the Delaware Correctional System — David Stevenson, Michael Manley, and Michael L. Jones — filed an action under 42 U.S.C. § 1983 against Warden Thomas Carroll, alleging violations of their substantive and procedural due process rights. The District Court dismissed their complaint. On appeal, they assert that their allegations of placement in restrictive confinement state valid substantive and procedural due process claims sufficient to survive a motion to dismiss. We agree, and remand the case to the District Court.
I
At the time of…
2Cases cited21 opinions
- Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
- Erickson v. PardusSupreme Court of the United States · 2007
- Mathews v. EldridgeSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- Wolff v. McDonnellSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
- Bell v. WolfishSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by415 opinions
- Peter Bistrian v. Troy LeviCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2012
- Dustin Williamson v. Bryan StirlingCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2018
- E. D. v. Daniel SharkeyCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2019
- Yusef Steele v. Warden CicchiCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2017
- Williams v. Secretary Pennsylvania Department of CorrectionsCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2017
410 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.