Legal Opinion

Ruskay v. Reed

District Court, S.D. New York

Decided December 30, 1963PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

FEINBERG, District Judge.

Defendants move under 28 U.S.C. § 1404(a) to transfer this action to the Western District of Missouri. The present action is a consolidation of three stockholders’ suits brought derivatively on behalf of United Funds, Inc. (“United”), a mutual investment fund, and representatively on behalf of United’s stockholders. Two of the three suits were commenced in August 1960, and the third in September 1963. In brief, the amended complaint alleges that defendant United, certain of its officers and directors, its investment advisers, and its principal underwriter fixed the…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Ford Motor Co. v. Ryan. Ferguson v. Ford Motor Co.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1950
  2. Brown v. BullockCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1961
  3. Peyser v. General Motors CorporationDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1958
  4. J. John Brouk, James J. Mullen, Jr., W. Munro Roberts, Jr. v. Managed Funds, IncorporatedCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1961
  5. Managed Funds, Inc. v. BroukSupreme Court of the United States · 1962

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. American Standard, Inc. v. Bendix Corp.District Court, W.D. Missouri · 1980
  2. McMenomy v. RydenSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1967
  3. Herbst v. AbleDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1967
  4. Levin v. Mississippi River CorporationDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1968
  5. Fogel v. WolfgangDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1969

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API