Legal Opinion

State v. Courcier

Supreme Court of Louisiana

Decided May 15, 1894No. 11,399PublishedCited by 4 opinions

PPEAL from the First Recorder’s Oourt, City of New Orleans. Adams, J. Ordinance No. 92, O. S., of the City of New Orleans, making it unlawful for any one to sell, barter, exchange, or otherwise dispose of any lottery ticket or- token of any kind, is a legal and constitutional ordinance.

Read the full summary

PPEAL from the First Recorder’s Oourt, City of New Orleans. Adams, J. Ordinance No. 92, O. S., of the City of New Orleans, making it unlawful for any one to sell, barter, exchange, or otherwise dispose of any lottery ticket or- token of any kind, is a legal and constitutional ordinance. In appeals from convictions under City Ordinances the jurisdiction of the Supreme Court is confined to an examination and determination of the legality and constitutionality of the Oity Ordinance under which the said fine or imprisonment was imposed. With the affidavit and the facts set forth in it, and with…

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the court was delivered by

Nicholas, C. J.

The defendant, charged with having violated an Ordinance of the City of New Orleans, was tried in the First Recorder’s Court of that City, found guilty and sentenced to pay a fine of twenty-five dollars, or, in default of payment of said fine, to imprisonment in the parish prison for the term of thirty days. The trial was conducted before and the judgment rendered and signed by Samuel Levy, signing himself acting judge of the First Recorder’s Court of New Orleans. The defendant has appealed.

The affidavit on which he was arrested charges…

2Cited by4 opinions

  1. State Farm Mut. Automobile Ins. Co. v. OttSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1952
  2. State v. Gallagher Transfer & Storage Co.Supreme Court of Louisiana · 1923
  3. State v. PeterSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1922
  4. Succession of KotzLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1991

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API