Legal Opinion

Tate v. McCall Hospital

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Decided April 22, 1938No. 26746PublishedCited by 20 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtSutton, J.

The general rule as to the duty owed by a private hospital to a patient is well stated in Emory University v. Shadburn, 47 Ga. App. 643 (171 S. E. 192), and Stansfield v. Gardner, 56 Ga. App. 634 (193 S. E. 375), as follows: "A private hospital in which patients are placed for treatment by their physicians, and which undertakes to care for the patients and supervise and look after them, is under the duty to exercise such reasonable care in looking after and protecting a patient as the patient’s condition, which is known to the hospital through its agents and servants charged with the duty of…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Stansfield v. GardnerCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1937
  2. Emory University v. ShadburnCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1933

3Cited by20 opinions

  1. Spivey v. St. Thomas HospitalCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 1947
  2. Hernández Rivera v. Gobierno de la CapitalSupreme Court of Puerto Rico · 1960
  3. Brandvain v. Ridgeview Institute, Inc.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1988
  4. Fowler, Admx. v. Norways SanatoriumIndiana Court of Appeals · 1942
  5. Gregory v. RobinsonSupreme Court of Missouri · 1960

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API