Tate v. McCall Hospital
Court of Appeals of Georgia
1Opinion of the CourtSutton, J.
The general rule as to the duty owed by a private hospital to a patient is well stated in Emory University v. Shadburn, 47 Ga. App. 643 (171 S. E. 192), and Stansfield v. Gardner, 56 Ga. App. 634 (193 S. E. 375), as follows: "A private hospital in which patients are placed for treatment by their physicians, and which undertakes to care for the patients and supervise and look after them, is under the duty to exercise such reasonable care in looking after and protecting a patient as the patient’s condition, which is known to the hospital through its agents and servants charged with the duty of…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Stansfield v. GardnerCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1937
- Emory University v. ShadburnCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1933
3Cited by20 opinions
- Spivey v. St. Thomas HospitalCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 1947
- Hernández Rivera v. Gobierno de la CapitalSupreme Court of Puerto Rico · 1960
- Brandvain v. Ridgeview Institute, Inc.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1988
- Fowler, Admx. v. Norways SanatoriumIndiana Court of Appeals · 1942
- Gregory v. RobinsonSupreme Court of Missouri · 1960
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.