Legal Opinion

Tillman v. Vance Equipment Co.

Oregon Supreme Court

Decided June 26, 1979No. 415-523, SC 25158PublishedCited by 47 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtDenecke, C. J.

Plaintiff brought this action based upon the theory of strict liability in tort to recover for personal injuries caused by a 24-year-old crane sold by defendant, a used equipment dealer, to plaintiff’s employer, Durametal. The court tried the case without a jury and found for the defendant. The plaintiff appeals and we affirm.

Durametal asked the defendant to locate a crane for purchase by Durametal. Defendant found one that looked suitable; Durametal inspected and approved it. The defendant purchased the crane and immediately resold it to Durametal. Defendant prepared documents making the…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Greenman v. Yuba Power Products, Inc.California Supreme Court · 1963
  2. Vandermark v. Ford Motor Co.California Supreme Court · 1964
  3. Dunham v. Vaughan & Bushnell Mfg. Co.Illinois Supreme Court · 1969
  4. Heaton v. Ford Motor Co.Oregon Supreme Court · 1967
  5. Wights v. Staff Jennings, Inc.Oregon Supreme Court · 1965

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by47 opinions

  1. Saratoga Fishing Co. v. J. M. Martinac & Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1997
  2. Kodiak Electric Ass'n v. Delaval Turbine, Inc.Alaska Supreme Court · 1984
  3. Gonzalez v. Rutherford Corp.District Court, E.D. New York · 1995
  4. LaRosa v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1981
  5. Peterson v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1995

42 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API