Legal Opinion · Dissent

City of Fairmont v. Pitrolo Pontiac-Cadillac Co.

West Virginia Supreme Court

Decided October 17, 1983No. CC935Published

1DissentNeely, Justice

This is preeminently a case requiring the application of stare decisis. This case should be controlled by McCoy v. Sistersville, 120 W.Va. 471, 199 S.E. 260 (1938). In that case, we held the following: (1) the provision of the W.Va.Code (now Code, 8-13-13 [1971]) that allows cities to make separate charges for specific, enumerated services is constitutional; (2) cities may charge for fire protection under the authority of what is now Code, 8-13-13 [1971] on the basis of use; and (3) fees based on the value of improvements and personal property bear such a reasonable correlation to the actual…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. McCoy v. City of SistersvilleWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1938
  2. City of Fairmont v. BishopWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1910
  3. In Re MytingerDistrict Court, N.D. Texas · 1940
  4. City of Charleston v. BOARD OF ED., ETC.West Virginia Supreme Court · 1974
  5. Hare v. City of WheelingWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1982

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API