Holm v. Montgomery
Washington Supreme Court
Appeal from a judgment of the superior court for Kittitas county, Kauffman, J., entered July 5, 1910, upon sustaining a demurrer to the complaint, dismissing an action to enjoin a trespass upon a public highway.
1Opinion of the CourtMorris, J.
Appeal from a judgment dismissing action Upon appellant’s refusal to plead further to an order sustaining a general demurrer to his complaint. The complaint set forth that appellant was the owner of certain déscribed Teal property in Kittitas county, and that Hans Hansen Was the owner of other described land, separated from appellant’s land by a county road sixty feet in width, the traveled portion of the road being in the center thereof, leaving a strip on each side not necessary for road purposes; that appellant required water for the proper cultivation of his lands, which he obtained from…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Simons v. WilsonWashington Supreme Court · 1911
- Nelson v. FehdIllinois Supreme Court · 1903
- Thom v. County of DodgeNebraska Supreme Court · 1902
- Dexter v. Riverside & Oswego MillsNew York Supreme Court · 1891
3Cited by9 opinions
- Bradley v. Spokane & Inland Empire RailroadWashington Supreme Court · 1914
- Lanham v. ForneyWashington Supreme Court · 1938
- Holmquist v. King CountyCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2014
- People v. GoodspeedCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1948
- State v. Camp Lewis Service & Garage Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1924
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.