Legal Opinion

United States v. Thomas L. Hudspeth

Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit

Decided October 28, 1994No. 93-1352Published

1Opinion of the Court

42 F.3d 1015

63 USLW 2351

UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee,

v.

Thomas L. HUDSPETH, Defendant-Appellant.

No. 93-1352.

United States Court of Appeals,

Seventh Circuit.

Argued En Banc June 10, 1994.

Decided Oct. 28, 1994.*

Byron G. Cudmore, Asst. U.S. Atty., Rodger Heaton (argued), Office of the United States Attorney, Springfield, IL, for plaintiff-appellee.

Samuel J. Cahnman, Springfield, IL, (argued), for defendant-appellant.

Before POSNER, Chief Judge, FAIRCHILD,** CUMMINGS, BAUER, COFFEY, FLAUM, EASTERBROOK, RIPPLE, MANION, KANNE and ROVNER, Circuit Judges.***

COFFEY, Circuit Judge.

1

Thomas…

Also in this document: Concurrence; Concurring in part, dissenting in part · Flaum; Concurring in part, dissenting in part · Ripple.

2Cases cited78 opinions

  1. Taylor v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1990
  2. Burks v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
  3. Ashe v. SwensonSupreme Court of the United States · 1970
  4. Missouri v. HunterSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
  5. United States v. HalperSupreme Court of the United States · 1989

73 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API