Legal Opinion · Dissent

Roach v. Concord Boat Corp.

Supreme Court of Arkansas

Decided July 5, 1994No. 94-40Published

1Dissent

Robert H. Dudley,

dissenting. Plaintiff, Danny Roach, filed suit in chancery court against defendant, Concord Boat Corporation. Plaintiff’s complaint contained counts alleging deceit and mistake. Defendant did not file a motion asking that plaintiff be required to elect between the inconsistent remedies for these causes of action, rather it filed a counterclaim for an account stated, an action cognizable at law. The chancellor did not rule on the mistake count asking for rescission, but ruled on plaintiff’s deceit count asking for damages and the defendant’s counterclaim. The majority opinion…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Liles v. LilesSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1986
  2. Wheeler Motor Co., Inc. v. RothSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1993
  3. Smith v. Walt Bennett Ford, Inc.Supreme Court of Arkansas · 1993
  4. MFA Mutual Insurance v. KellerSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1981
  5. Otto v. YoungSupreme Court of Missouri · 1910

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API