Legal Opinion

In Re the Arbitration Between H & M Charters, Inc. & Reed

District Court, S.D. Ohio

Decided February 14, 1991No. C2-91-75PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

GEORGE C. SMITH, District Judge.

OPINION AND ORDER

This matter is before the Court upon petitioner, H & M Charters’ (Hereinafter “Charters”) Petition to Compel Arbitration filed January 28, 1991. Charters Petition was followed by a Motion to Stay Proceedings Pending Arbitration filed the same day. This matter was set for oral argument on February 6, 1991, at 9:00 A.M. to address the issues presented 1 and to accommodate Charters’ Petition, inasmuch as trial in Florida could commence on February 15, 1991. 2 This Court telephoned personally all of the counsel within this matter to inform them of…

2Cases cited40 opinions

  1. Moses H. Cone Memorial Hospital v. Mercury Construction Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1983
  2. Mitsubishi Motors Corp. v. Soler Chrysler-Plymouth, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1985
  3. Dean Witter Reynolds Inc. v. ByrdSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
  4. Atkinson v. Sinclair Refining Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1962
  5. Robert Lawrence Company, Inc. v. Devonshire Fabrics, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1959

35 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. McGuire, Cornwell & Blakey v. GriderDistrict Court, D. Colorado · 1991
  2. Southern Systems, Inc. v. Torrid Oven Ltd.District Court, W.D. Tennessee · 2000
  3. Uwaydah v. Van Wert County HospitalDistrict Court, N.D. Ohio · 2002
  4. Stout v. ByriderDistrict Court, N.D. Ohio · 1999
  5. Systran Financial Services Corp. v. Giant Cement Holding, Inc.District Court, N.D. Ohio · 2003

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API