Legal Opinion
Ronald Calzone v. Josh Hawley
Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit
Decided August 7, 2017No. 16-3650PublishedCited by 268 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
COLLOTON, Circuit Judge.
Ronald Calzone sued three state officials to challenge provisions of Missouri law that authorize roving stops of certain vehicles for inspection without suspicion. The district court held that the statutes were not unconstitutional on their face. The court also ruled that Calzone’s as-applied challenge was not adequately pleaded, because the defendants could not be sued in their official capacities under 42 U.S.C. § 1983. We affirm the court’s conclusion that the statutes are not facially unconstitutional, but we conclude that the as-applied challenge against the…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Lujan v. Defenders of WildlifeSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
- Will v. Michigan Department of State PoliceSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
- Ex Parte YoungSupreme Court of the United States · 1908
- United States v. SalernoSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
- New York v. BurgerSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by268 opinions
- Nancy Carola Jacobsen v. Florida Secretary of StateCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2020
- Daves v. Dallas CountyCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2022
- Shondel Church v. State of MissouriCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2019
- Thomas Fox v. Saginaw Cnty., Mich.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2023
- Christopher McDaniel v. Anne PrecytheCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2018
263 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.