Legal Opinion

Christopher McDaniel v. Anne Precythe

Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit

Decided July 27, 2018No. 17-1055PublishedCited by 35 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

COLLOTON, Circuit Judge.

Christopher McDaniel sued the Director of the Missouri Department of Corrections, alleging that the Director's procedures for inviting citizens to witness executions violate McDaniel's rights under the Due Process Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment. The Director moved to dismiss McDaniel's claim on the grounds that McDaniel lacks standing and that the Director is immune from suit under the Eleventh Amendment. The district court 2 denied the motion, and the Director appeals. We affirm.

I

Because this appeal arises from the denial of a motion to dismiss, we accept as true…

2Cases cited19 opinions

  1. Lujan v. Defenders of WildlifeSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
  2. Steel Co. v. Citizens for a Better EnvironmentSupreme Court of the United States · 1998
  3. Ex Parte YoungSupreme Court of the United States · 1908
  4. Spokeo, Inc. v. RobinsSupreme Court of the United States · 2016
  5. Puerto Rico Aqueduct and Sewer Authority v. Metcalf & Eddy, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1993

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by35 opinions

  1. Kodiak Oil & Gas (USA) Inc. v. Mary SeaworthCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2019
  2. Pharmaceutical Research v. Stuart WilliamsCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2023
  3. Stacey Johnson v. Tim GriffinCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2023
  4. Harrington v. StrongDistrict Court, D. Nebraska · 2019
  5. Jason McGehee v. Nebraska Dept. of Corr. Svcs.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2021

30 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API