Legal Opinion

Universal Holding Co. v. North Bergen Tp.

New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division

Decided March 31, 1959PublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

55 N.J. Super. 103 (1959)

150 A.2d 44

UNIVERSAL HOLDING CO., A NEW JERSEY CORPORATION, PLAINTIFF-RESPONDENT,

v.

TOWNSHIP OF NORTH BERGEN AND EUGENE A. AGRESTA, BUILDING INSPECTOR OF THE TOWNSHIP OF NORTH BERGEN, DEFENDANTS-APPELLANTS. SCHWARTZ-SNIDERMAN, INC., A CORPORATION OF NEW JERSEY, THIRD PARTY DEFENDANT-RESPONDENT.

Superior Court of New Jersey, Appellate Division.

Argued January 5, 1959.

Decided March 31, 1959.

Before Judges GOLDMANN, CONFORD and FREUND.

Mr. Nicholas S. Schloeder argued the cause for defendants-appellants.

Mr. Joseph Keane argued the cause for plaintiff-respondent (Messrs.…

2Cases cited26 opinions

  1. Kozesnik v. Township of MontgomerySupreme Court of New Jersey · 1957
  2. Jantausch v. Borough of VeronaNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1956
  3. Jantausch v. Borough of VeronaSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1957
  4. Garrou v. Teaneck Tryon Co.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 1953
  5. Vogt Ex Rel. Vogt v. Borough of BelmarSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1954

21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. Hilton Acres v. KleinSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1961
  2. Moore v. Bridgewater Tp.New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1961
  3. Township of Fairfield v. Likanchuk'sNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1994
  4. Weber v. PierettiNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1962
  5. Harbour Town Associates, Ltd. v. City of NoblesvilleIndiana Court of Appeals · 1989

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API