Legal Opinion
Ammen v. City of Pineville
Supreme Court of Louisiana
Decided December 14, 1964No. 47230PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
SANDERS, Justice.
This is an action for a declaratory judgment. Plaintiffs, Arthur K. Ammen and Kumalee B. Ammen, seek a decree that a paving assessment levied, by the City of Pineville against five lots owned by them in the City is null and void on the ground that the properties do not abut the improved street. The City of Pineville filed a *92peremptory exception, pleading that the demands of plaintiffs were prescribed or per-empted by the lapse of 30 days without legal action as provided by LSA-R.S. 33 3319.
The district court overruled the plea of prescription. After granting writs, the Court…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Miller v. Town of BerniceSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1937
- McLavy v. American Legion Housing Corp.Supreme Court of Louisiana · 1955
- Crow v. Board of Sup'rs of Road Dist. No. 19, Parish of NatchitochesSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1917
- Morgan's L. & T. R. & S. S. Co. v. Tax CollectorSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1917
- Ammen v. City of PinevilleLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1964
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Abbott v. ParkerSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1971
- Lewis v. City of PinevilleSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1964
- Lewis v. City of PinevilleSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1964