State v. Stahl
South Dakota Supreme Court
1Per curiam
[¶ 1.] Dean Desire Stahl appeals from his judgments of conviction and sentence for possession of marijuana, distribution of marijuana, and distribution of marijuana in a drug-free zone. Stahl claims his 24-year sentence constitutes cruel and unusual punishment and an abuse of the sentencing court’s discretion. We affirm.
FACTS AND PROCEDURE
[¶ 2.] Stahl sold marijuana to Avery Sorenson on December 9 and 11, 1998 while Sorenson was assisting law enforcement with controlled drug buys. Two officers of the Huron Police Department had earlier searched Sorenson, provided him with money with which to…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Harmelin v. MichiganSupreme Court of the United States · 1991
- State v. BonnerSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1998
- State v. Chase in WinterSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1995
- State v. EngelSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1991
- State v. KaiserSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1995
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- State v. GarberSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 2004
- State v. PasekSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 2004
- State v. HerrmannSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 2004
- State v. BlairSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 2006
- State v. BeckwithSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 2015
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.