Legal Opinion

Furtado v. Emerson Rug Co.

Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court

Decided April 2, 1964PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Exceptions overruled. In this action of tort for negligence the upon plaintiff, a business invitee of the defendant, while walking along a carpeted four foot aisle formed by display racks on one side and a long table on the other, with her attention directed to a roll of carpeting at the top of the wall ahead of her, tripped and fell over an irregular pile of five or six rug samples, two by three feet in size, which several minutes before had been removed by one of the defendant’s salesmen from the table and placed in the aisle for examination by other customers, who, with the salesman, had…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Letiecq v. Denholm & McKay Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1951
  2. St. Rock v. GagnonMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1961
  3. Robicheau v. Supreme Markets, Inc.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1956
  4. Knightly v. Bell Shops of Brockton, Inc.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1962

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Vance v. GouldMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1968
  2. Doherty v. First National Stores, Inc.Massachusetts District Court, Appellate Division · 1964
  3. O'Leary v. First National Stores, Inc.Massachusetts District Court, Appellate Division · 1967

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API