Legal Opinion

Knightly v. Bell Shops of Brockton, Inc.

Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court

Decided November 1, 1962PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Exceptions overruled. Verdicts were returned for the female plaintiff for injuries sustained in a fall in the defendant’s store where she was a business invitee, and for her husband for consequential damages. The only question presented is whether there was error in the denial of the defendant’s motion for directed verdicts. Four photographs aid our understanding of the testimony. The jury could find the following : The plaintiff walked along an aisle bounded on her right by an open showcase in which ladies’ garments were displayed hanging from a rack. She turned to the right at the end of…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Letiecq v. Denholm & McKay Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1951
  2. Parker v. Jordan Marsh Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1941
  3. Robicheau v. Supreme Markets, Inc.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1956
  4. Cambi v. Riverside Park Enterprises, Inc.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1962

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Vance v. GouldMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1968
  2. Furtado v. Emerson Rug Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1964
  3. Starita v. Stop & Shop, Inc.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1964
  4. O'Leary v. First National Stores, Inc.Massachusetts District Court, Appellate Division · 1967

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API