Legal Opinion
Cobell v. Norton
District Court, District of Columbia
Decided March 15, 2004No. CIV.A.96-1285(RCL)PublishedCited by 12 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION
LAMBERTH, District Judge.
On July 28, 2003, the Court issued a preliminary injunction requiring the Department of the Interior to “immediately disconnect from the Internet all Information Technology Systems within [its] custody or control ... until such time as the Court approves their reconnection to the Internet.” Cobell v. Norton, 274 F.Supp.2d 111, 135 (D.D.C.2003). In doing so, the Court carved out two exceptions: those systems impacting life or property and those for which Interior certifies “in accordance with Rule 11 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure” that “do[…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Griggs v. Provident Consumer Discount Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1982
- Cobell, Elouise v. Norton, Gale A.Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2001
- Joan Eddy, of the Estate of James Peter Eddy v. Colonial Life Insurance Company of AmericaCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1990
- Al-Fayed v. Central Intelligence AgencyCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2001
- Venen v. SweetCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1985
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by12 opinions
- Cobell, Elouise v. Norton, GaleCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2004
- Cobell, Elouise v. Kempthorne, DirkCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2006
- Cobell v. NortonDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2005
- In Re RiveraUnited States Bankruptcy Court, D. New Jersey · 2006
- Davenport v. Board of Trustees of the State Center Community College DistrictDistrict Court, E.D. California · 2009
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.