Legal Opinion
Eastern Greyhound Lines v. Fusco
Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit
Decided December 4, 1962No. 15153PublishedCited by 15 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
O’SULLIVAN, Circuit Judge.
This cause is before us on plaintiff-appellant’s motion for an injunction pending appeal. Plaintiff-appellant, Eastern Greyhound Lines, is a common carrier operating out of Cleveland, Ohio. Defendant-appellee, Fusco, is the Regional Director for the Eighth Region of the National Labor Relations Board. On April 2, 1962, the Amalgamated Association of Street, Electric Railway and Motor Coach Employees of America, AFL-CIO, intervenor here, filed a representation petition with the Eighth Region of the Labor Board requesting that a representation election be conducted…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Bell v. HoodSupreme Court of the United States · 1946
- Leedom v. KyneSupreme Court of the United States · 1958
- Virginian Railway Co. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1927
- Scripps-Howard Radio, Inc. v. Federal Communications CommissionSupreme Court of the United States · 1942
- American Federation of Labor v. National Labor Relations BoardSupreme Court of the United States · 1940
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by15 opinions
- Hamlin Testing Laboratories, Inc. v. United States Atomic Energy CommissionCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1964
- MDG Supply, Inc. v. Diversified Investments, Inc.Hawaii Supreme Court · 1969
- Eastern Greyhound Lines v. FuscoCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1963
- Chicago and North Western Railway Company v. United Transportation Union, Chicago and North Western Railway Company v. United Transportation UnionCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1970
- The Firestone Tire & Rubber Company v. Bernard Samoff, Regional Director for the Fourth Region of the National Labor Relations BoardCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1966
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.