Legal Opinion

Christopher Rodland v. Superintendent Houtzdale SCI

Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit

Decided December 16, 2020No. 18-1892Unpublished

1Opinion of the Court

NOT PRECEDENTIAL UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE THIRD CIRCUIT ____________ No. 18-1892 ______ CHRISTOPHER M. RODLAND, Appellant v. SUPERINTENDENT OF SCI HOUTZDALE; BLAIR COUNTY DISTRICT ATTORNEY; ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA ____________ On Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Pennsylvania (D.C. Civ. No. 3-09-cv-00078) District Judge: Honorable Kim R. Gibson ____________ Submitted under Third Circuit LAR 34.1(a) September 30, 2020 Before: SHWARTZ, PHIPPS, and SCIRICA, Circuit Judges. (Opinion Filed: December 16, 2020)…

2Cases cited27 opinions

  1. Coleman v. ThompsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1991
  2. Barker v. WingoSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
  3. Cohen v. Beneficial Industrial Loan Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1949
  4. O'Sullivan v. BoerckelSupreme Court of the United States · 1999
  5. Wainwright v. SykesSupreme Court of the United States · 1977

22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API