Legal Opinion

City of New Haven v. Pantani

Connecticut Appellate Court

Decided June 21, 2005No. AC 25294PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

LAVERY, C. J.

The defendant Edmund L. Pantani1 appeals from the judgment of foreclosure by sale ren*677dered after the trial court granted the motion for summary judgment filed by the plaintiff, the city of New Haven. The defendant claims that the court improperly determined that the documentation submitted with the motion for summary judgment was adequate2 and that the judgment should be reversed because it was based on the improper granting of the summary judgment motion. We reverse the judgment of the trial court.

The following facts and procedural history are relevant to our resolution…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Home Insurance v. Aetna Life & Casualty Co.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1995
  2. Evans Products Co. v. Clinton Building Supply, Inc.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1978
  3. United Services Automobile Ass'n v. MarburgConnecticut Appellate Court · 1997

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. Rockwell v. QuintnerConnecticut Appellate Court · 2006
  2. Kosiorek v. SmigelskiConnecticut Appellate Court · 2012
  3. Gianetti v. ANTHEM BLUE CROSS AND BLUE SHIELD OF CT.Connecticut Appellate Court · 2008
  4. Bank of New York v. ConwayConnecticut Superior Court · 2006
  5. Hudson City Savings Bank v. HellmanConnecticut Appellate Court · 2020

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API