Frank M. Ockerman, Individually and on Behalf of All Others Similarly Situated, (92-5265) v. May Zima & Company, (92-5266)
Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
KENNEDY, Circuit Judge.
We permitted this interlocutory appeal on two issues decided by the District Court on a claim brought under section 10(b) of the Securities and Exchange Act of 1934,15 U.S.C. § 78j, and Rule 10b-5, 17 C.F.R. § 240.10b-5. The first issue, appealed by plaintiff Frank Ockerman, is whether the District Court applied the appropriate statute of limitations when it ruled that plaintiffs 10b-5 claim is barred by the statute of repose found in Tennessee’s Securities Act of 1980 (also referred to as Tennessee’s Blue Sky law). The second issue, appealed by May Zima & Co., is…
2Cases cited29 opinions
- Basic Inc. v. LevinsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1988
- Affiliated Ute Citizens of Utah v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- Griffin v. Oceanic Contractors, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1982
- Lampf, Pleva, Lipkind, Prupis & Petigrow v. GilbertsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1991
- Block v. North Dakota Ex Rel. Board of University & School LandsSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by55 opinions
- Pennsylvania Public School Employees' Retirement System v. Morgan Stanley & Co.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2014
- New England Health Care Employees Pension Fund, on Behalf of Itself and All Others Similarly Situated v. Ernst & Young, LLPCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2003
- Joseph v. WilesCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2000
- Lyon v. Agusta, S.P.A.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2001
- In Re Enron Corp. SecuritiesDistrict Court, S.D. Texas · 2006
50 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.