Legal Opinion

Flisk v. Central Area Park District

Appellate Court of Illinois

Decided September 18, 1990No. 1-89-0443PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Scariano

Plaintiffs charge that defendants wrongfully terminated their employment as police officers and seek both equitable relief and damages. After a default judgment was entered in favor of plaintiffs, defendants filed a petition to vacate pursuant to section 2 — 1401 of the Code of Civil Procedure (Ill. Rev. Stat. 1987, ch. 110, par. 2— 1401), which itself was subsequently dismissed for want of prosecution. However, the trial judge granted a second section 2 — 1401 petition filed by defendants approximately six months later. Plaintiffs appeal from this ruling. We reverse.

On June 30, 1987,…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Smith v. Airoom, Inc.Illinois Supreme Court · 1986
  2. Elfman v. Evanston Bus Co.Illinois Supreme Court · 1963
  3. Ellman v. De RuiterIllinois Supreme Court · 1952
  4. Hickey v. Illinois Central RailroadIllinois Supreme Court · 1966
  5. Kaput v. HoeyIllinois Supreme Court · 1988

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Salazar v. Wiley Sanders Trucking Co.Appellate Court of Illinois · 1991
  2. Cruz v. Columbus-Cuneo-Cabrini Medical CenterAppellate Court of Illinois · 1994
  3. Mills v. McDuffaAppellate Court of Illinois · 2009
  4. Skrypek v. MazzocchiAppellate Court of Illinois · 1992
  5. Genesis & Sons, Ltd. v. TheodosopoulosAppellate Court of Illinois · 1991

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API