Legal Opinion
English Elec. Valve Co., Ltd. v. M/V Hoegh Mallard
District Court, S.D. New York
Decided June 11, 1986No. 83 Civ. 0261 (MEL)PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
LASKER, District Judge.
This admiralty case arises from water damage to an ocean shipment of electronic equipment from Oakland, California to Til-bury, England. The issues were presented to the court at a three-day non-jury trial following which the parties submitted pro posed findings of fact and conclusions of law. The court finds that the plaintiff has failed to sustain its burden of proof on its damage claims and that the defendant is entitled to judgment accordingly. 1
I
Plaintiff English Electric Valve Co., Ltd. (“EEV”) is a British company engaged in the manufacture of electronic tubes.…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Encyclopaedia Britannica, Inc. v. Ss Hong Kong Producer, Her Engines, Etc., and Universal Marine CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1969
- Seguros Banvenez, S.A. v. S/S Oliver DrescherCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1985
- Jones v. the Flying ClipperDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1953
- Iligan Integrated Steel Mills, Inc. v. Ss John Weyerhaeuser, Her Engines, Boilers, Etc., Defendants-Appellees-AppellantsCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1974
- General Electric Company International Sales Division v. S.S. Nancy Lykes, Her Engines, Boilers, Etc. And Lykes Bros. Steamship Company, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1983
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- English Electric Valve Co. v. M/V Hoegh MallardCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1987
- English Electric Valve Co., Ltd. v. M/V Hoegh MallardCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1987
- National Union Fire Insurance Company of Pittsburgh, P.A. v. Vinardell Power Systems, Inc.District Court, S.D. Florida · 2020