Legal Opinion

Rothman v. Commonwealth

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Decided January 2, 1962No. Appeal, 5PublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Me. Justice Musmanno,

Prior to June 2, 1958, George Rothman and Dorothy K. Rothman, the plaintiffs in this case, owned 156 acres of farmland in Lower Paxton Township, Dauphin County, with a thoroughfare known as Locust Lane, 33 feet wide, running through it. In keeping with the modern trend of attempting to convert the rural world into a residential paradise, the Rothmans engaged, in the spring of 1956, a registered surveyor to make up a plot plan, looking toward preparing their land for building purposes. By the fall of 1956, people were asking Rothman about purchasing lots on his…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Penn. Schuyl. V. R. v. ClearySupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1889
  2. Earl M. Kerstetter, Inc. v. CommonwealthSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1961
  3. Gorgas v. Philadelphia, Harrisburg & Pittsburg RailroadSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1906

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. Pennsylvania Gas & Water Co. v. Pennsylvania Turnpike CommissionSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1967
  2. Felix v. Baldwin-Whitehall School DistrictCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1972
  3. State Ex Rel. Lord v. MaleckerSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1963
  4. Commonwealth v. FoxCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1974
  5. D'Alfonso v. Department of TransportationCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1972

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API