Legal Opinion

People ex rel. Kurtz v. Meyer

Appellate Court of Illinois

Decided May 2, 1928No. Gen. No. 8,202PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Niehaus

The appeal taken in this case was transferred by the Supreme Court to this court. (People ex rel. Sibert Kurtz v. Meyer, 328 Ill. 122.) And the facts involved in this controversy are summarized in the opinion of the court transferring the case:

1 ‘ Sibert Kurtz, commissioner of highways of Cincinnati township, Pike county, in the name of the People of the State of Illinois upon his relation, filed his petition in the circuit court of Pike county for a writ of mandamus against appellants. The petitioner alleged his official position, the organization of Sny Island Levee Drainage District under…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. People ex rel. Burow v. BlockIllinois Supreme Court · 1916
  2. People ex rel. Speck v. PeelerIllinois Supreme Court · 1919
  3. People Ex Rel. Kurtz v. MeyerIllinois Supreme Court · 1927
  4. Brougher v. Lost Creek Drainage DistrictIllinois Supreme Court · 1917

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. City of Chicago v. Sanitary District of ChicagoIllinois Supreme Court · 1949
  2. Metropolitan Sanitary District v. Village of RomeovilleIllinois Supreme Court · 1981
  3. Village of North Utica v. StateCourt of Claims of Illinois · 1929

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API