Legal Opinion

Prentice v. Gulotta

New York Supreme Court

Decided May 15, 1958PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtHoward T. Hogan, J.

The petitioner herein prays for an order requiring the District Attorney of Nassau County to present to the Grand Jury facts allegedly constituting a crime which was committed by Mary M. Prentice, the former wife of the petitioner.

It is alleged that on March 4, 1958 the petitioner, after a contested habeas corpus proceeding, was awarded the custody of his son by Mr. Justice Hill in a memorandum decision. An order was entered on that decision on March 10, 1958. Prior to the entry of the order but allegedly subsequent to and with knowledge of the decision, the wife, who theretofore had lawful…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Hale v. HenkelSupreme Court of the United States · 1906
  2. People v. FlorioNew York Court of Appeals · 1950
  3. People Ex Rel. Hummel v. . Trial TermNew York Court of Appeals · 1906
  4. McDonald v. GoldsteinAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1948
  5. In re BothAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1922

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. People ex rel. Doe v. BeaudoinAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1984
  2. Zimmerman v. City of New YorkNew York Supreme Court · 1966
  3. Perazzo v. LindsayAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1968
  4. People v. SiragusaNassau County District Court · 1975
  5. Davis Construction Corp. v. County of SuffolkNew York Supreme Court · 1982

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API