Cohen v. Laiti
District Court, E.D. New York
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM & ORDER
PLATT, District Judge.
Plaintiff, Robert D. Cohen, has moved to certify the instant proceeding as a class action, pursuant to Fed.R.Civ.P. 23(b)(3). As a named plaintiff, Mr. Cohen must first demonstrate that his claims “are typical of the claims ... of the class,” Fed.R.Civ.P. 23(a)(3), and that he will “fairly and adequately protect” its interests. Fed.R.Civ.P. 23(a)(4). We find that the facts of this case are closely analogous to the facts of Kline v. Wolf, 702 F.2d 400, 401 (2d Cir.1983), where the Second Circuit upheld Judge Edward Weinfeld’s conclusion that the named…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Kline v. WolfCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1983
- Greenspan v. BrasslerDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1978
- Price Waterhouse v. PanzirerSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
- Schlanger v. Four-Phase Systems Inc.District Court, S.D. New York · 1982
- Weisman v. DarneilleDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1978
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by22 opinions
- Lapin v. Goldman Sachs & Co.District Court, S.D. New York · 2008
- Savino v. Computer Credit, Inc.District Court, E.D. New York · 1997
- Priest v. Zayre Corp.District Court, D. Massachusetts · 1988
- Darvin v. International Harvester Co.District Court, S.D. New York · 1985
- Katz v. Comdisco, Inc.District Court, N.D. Illinois · 1987
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.