Legal Opinion
State v. Champoux
Nebraska Court of Appeals
Decided October 15, 1996No. A-95-958PublishedCited by 10 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Irwin, Judge.
Steven M. Champoux appeals his conviction under a Lincoln municipal ordinance. The Lincoln Municipal Code generally provides that one may rent only to families property that is zoned for single-family or two-family use. The municipal ordinance in question defines a family as including not more than three unrelated persons. On appeal, Champoux challenges the constitutionality of the ordinance’s definition of “family.” For the reasons stated below, we affirm.
FACTS
On February 7, 1994, a criminal complaint was filed in the county court for Lancaster County, alleging Champoux had…
2Cases cited26 opinions
- Craig v. BorenSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- Village of Belle Terre v. BoraasSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
- City of Dallas v. StanglinSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
- Mills v. RogersSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
- State v. BakerSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1979
21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- Ames Rental Property Ass'n v. City of AmesSupreme Court of Iowa · 2007
- State v. ChampouxNebraska Supreme Court · 1997
- State v. RuisiNebraska Court of Appeals · 2000
- State v. HookstraNebraska Court of Appeals · 2001
- Dvorak v. City of BloomingtonIndiana Court of Appeals · 2002
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.