Legal Opinion
Colgate-Palmolive-Peet Co. v. National Labor Relations Board
Supreme Court of the United States
Decided December 12, 1949No. 47PublishedCited by 1 opinion
1Opinion of the Court 1
338 U.S. 355 (1949)
COLGATE-PALMOLIVE-PEET CO.
v.
NATIONAL LABOR RELATIONS BOARD ET AL.
No. 47.
Supreme Court of United States.
Argued November 17, 1949.
Decided December 5, 1949.
CERTIORARI TO THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT.
Ricardo J. Hecht argued the cause for petitioner. With him on the brief were Philip S. Ehrlich and Bartley C. Crum.
Ruth Weyand argued the cause for the National Labor Relations Board, respondent. With her on the brief were Solicitor General Perlman, Robert N. Denham, David P. Findling, Marcel Mallet-Prevost and Bernard Dunau.
Mathew O. Tobriner filed a…
Also in this document: Opinion of the Court · Minton.
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Wallace Corp. v. National Labor Relations BoardSupreme Court of the United States · 1944
- James v. Marinship Corp.California Supreme Court · 1944
- Algoma Plywood & Veneer Co. v. Wisconsin Employment Relations BoardSupreme Court of the United States · 1949
- Shafer v. Registered Pharmacists Union Local 1172California Supreme Court · 1940
- Park & Tilford Import Corp. v. International Brotherhood of TeamstersCalifornia Supreme Court · 1946
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- Beneli v. National Labor Relations BoardCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2017