People v. Weddington
California Court of Appeal
1Concurring in part, dissenting in part
ROTHSCHILD, P. J., Concurring and Dissenting. —
I concur in parts II, III, and V of the majority’s discussion, I concur in part and respectfully dissent in part to part I, and I respectfully dissent from part IV.
I. Attempted Burglary
A jury convicted defendants of burglary of a house on Labrador Street and attempted burglary of houses on Gothic Avenue, Gerald Avenue, and Tupper *493Street. The majority affirms all of the convictions. I, however, believe that the evidence is insufficient to support the jury’s verdicts that defendants are guilty of the three attempted burglaries. I would therefore…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- People v. PrinceCalifornia Supreme Court · 2007
- People v. MillerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1935
- People v. MurrayCalifornia Supreme Court · 1859
- People v. VizcarraCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1980
- Magness v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 2012
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.