Legal Opinion

United States v. Daniel Szymanski

Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit

Decided February 7, 2011No. 09-3524PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

MERRITT, Circuit Judge.

Defendant Daniel Szymanski pled guilty to receiving child pornography and was sentenced to five years’ imprisonment, the statutory minimum sentence applicable to that charge. On appeal, Szymanski raises a variety of constitutional arguments, principally contending that the mandatory minimum under which he was sentenced is unconstitutional in light of United States v. Booker, and because another offense — possession of child pornography, with which he was not charged and which, he alleges, is substantially similar if not identical to the receipt charge — does not…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Morissette v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1952
  2. United States v. X-Citement Video, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1994
  3. United States v. LalondeCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2007
  4. Charles L. Boals, Cross-Appellant v. Frank H. Gray, Superintendent, Ohio State Reformatory, Cross-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1985
  5. United States v. Julio ValdezCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2004

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. United States v. C.R.District Court, E.D. New York · 2011
  2. United States v. Kyle PetersonCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2021
  3. Quito v. BarrCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2020
  4. United States v. Kevin DennisCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2013
  5. State v. YanceyNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 2020

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API